Feature #1120
closed
- Priority changed from 3.x to Next Release
- Description updated (diff)
This will entail renaming local storage to be something else. But I can't think of a good name, and I find local storage to be evocative of what it entails.
Perhaps it would be best to just leave DOM storage as is.
Even though not consistent, Qt uses DOM storage when describing cookie filters.
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qwebenginecookiestore.html#setCookieFilter
- Status changed from New to Closed
After thinking about this for a while, I have decided not to make a change. DOM Storage fits better with the interface.
Also available in: Atom
PDF